SDMS-624 : "Having done it," or "having attained it."
After: What happened when ideology was there.
Before: The involvement of ideology in the war is what motivated it.
After: What began when ideology entered the scene.
Before: Their extraordinary reliance on the ideology was the cause of their reliance on it.
After: The tremendous reliance they had on the ideology was what drove them to rely on it.
Before: The military was designed, that is to say, it was made in such a way that the officers would of course backstab each other to ascend the chain of command.
After: The armed forces were set up, that is to say, they were designed so that the officers would naturally turn on one another to advance higher in the hierarchy of control.
Before: The fundamental types of war, above all, the war to wage an empire, but also the war to wage a state, and above all, the war to wage a bank, in saying this, I hoped to show that the world is indeed the thing that is to be fought for in the world, and in fact the world is the thing that is to be fought for in the world, and in fact the world is the thing that is to be fought for in the world.
After: When it comes to the fundamental types of war, especially the war to forge an empire, but also wars to establish states, and primarily, wars to operate a bank, I aim to illustrate that the world—the tangible thing we live in—is indeed what's worth fighting for in the world. In fact, the world is the thing we must contest for on this planet. The world—the actual world we inhabit—is the thing we must fight for on this planet.
Before: The business press, which was typical of what we know as business press today, was created by the first business press reporter, John Hudson, who was also the first business press reporter to write a book about a business press, which was typical of what we know as business press today.
After: William Habberton established the aristocracy press, which resembles the modern-day business press. He became the first aristocrat writer to write a book about the aristocracy press, reflecting the current trend of the today's business press.
Before: It paints the reader a picture of what it would be like to produce, collect, and move people, and how it might be possible even if there were health measures in place, and also paints the reader a picture of what it would be like to transport, distribute, and move people, and how it might be possible even if there were health measures in place.
After: It portrays a scenario for the reader, illustrating what life would be like if people were transported, collected, and moved—despite strict health measures.
Before: The ideology was a trick that was created by the press, and everyone was through ideological media output, not through the media itself.
After: The ideology became a tool employed by the press. In turn, it had an impact on all individuals through media pacts, rather than through the media itself.
Before: Of course the phenomenon of politics is an important part of the study of ideology, but it is also an important part of the study of politics, which is why I mentioned it.
After: The element of politics stands as an integral piece in the inquiry into ideology, just as it is a significant component in the analysis of politics—a point that I have brought to attention.
Before: This can be thought of now by asking the question of whether or not the government of an interpreting on, it would be a simple matter to look at the country in which a piece of food, but instead is it a matter of seeing whether or not the entirety of the world would be invaded by an ideology, and what would become of this ideology.
After: Instead of waiting for an ideology to overtake the globe, it is better to see whether even a part of the world would be dominated by it, and if so, what might come of this ideology.
2009年3月5日
英語字幕
中国語字幕
日本語字幕
フランス語字幕
