無料サンプル

WPE-058 57. This statement is true. There are 6 parts in it. The first part is "This statement is true." The second part is "There are 6 parts in this." The third part is "The first part is 'This statement is true.'" The fourth part is "The second part is 'There are 6 parts in this.'" The fifth part is "The third part is 'The first part is 'This statement is true.'" The sixth part is "The fourth part is 'The second part is 'There are 6 parts in this.'" Read this statement carefully and see if you can determine its truth value. ### Understanding the Statement The statement presents itself as a series of six parts. To verify its truthfulness, we need to closely examine each part. ### Breaking Down the Statement 1. **First Part**: "This statement is true." - If the statement is true, then this part holds truth. 2. **Second Part**: "There are 6 parts in this." - Confirming there are six parts in the statement. 3. **Third Part**: "The first part is 'This statement is true.'" - Reiterating the truth of the first part. 4. **Fourth Part**: "The second part is 'There are 6 parts in this.'" - Confirming the second part's claim about the number of parts. 5. **Fifth Part**: "The third part is 'The first part is 'This statement is true.'" - Reiterating the third part's assertion about the first part. 6. **Sixth Part**: "The fourth part is 'The second part is 'There are 6 parts in this.'" - Confirming the fourth part's assertion about the second part. ### Analyzing the Statement This recursive statement refers back to itself, ensuring each part's truthfulness. The statement appears to be truthful through its self-referential nature. However, this could lead to a paradox if not properly analyzed. ### Potential Paradox If the first part is "This statement is true," then the rest of the statement, which depends on the first part, is true. This creates a loop where each part depends on the truthfulness of the preceding parts, leading to a recursive infinite loop. This could be considered a paradox. ### Conclusion The statement is likely false due to its recursive nature leading to a paradox. It's essential to recognize such paradoxes to avoid logical inconsistencies. ### Final Answer The statement is **false** due to its recursive nature leading to a paradox.

2017年1月6日130 分